Friday, 9 October 2020

Dignity in Living and Dying

 

The first time I saw somebody die was in 1995 when I was a volunteer in Kalighat, Mother Therese’s ‘House for the Dying’ in Calcutta. If I am honest, my motivation for going there was far from noble. I was in my twenties and I wanted to be able to say I had spent time in Kalighat so I could ‘tick it off’ as a life experience.  Not the greatest of reasons to serve some of the poorest people on the planet.

With that said, it suffices to say, that my time there remains one of the most powerful humbling experiences of my life.

The people who ended up in Kalighat were literally picked up off the streets as they were dying. The amazing Sisters of Charity would be alerted, through the community network, to someone poor and gravely ill and arrangements would be made to bring the person to the house where they would be cared for till they died.

Without Kalighat these poor people would die anonymously on the streets and would literally be picked up by refuse trucks and disposed of in dumps.

There were trained nurses in Kalighat, who would administer pain relief medication, setup hydration drips and would dress any wounds that needed tending. Our job as volunteers was the most basic form of palliative care. We would make sure the person was comfortable and cared for and crucially not alone when they passed away. One of the most important parts of the job was to hold a person’s hand when they were in the final stages of life. We were asked to do simple things like stroke their hair, whisper to them gently and offer our presence in a loving way so that the last memory they would have of life was one of love.

One of the most powerful memories I have of my short time in Kalighat was that there was an abundance of happiness in the place. Contrary to what you might think, the house was full of joy. There were lots of smiles and laughter and it was a place of friendliness and openness – a place where you could be totally honest and free. You left your ego at the door of Kalighat.

I had one truly extraordinary experience there, where I spent an extended period of time with a dying man who was holding on to life so that his wife could visit him before he died. The problem was nobody knew where his wife was, and we were in Calcutta, a vast city with an unofficial population at the time of over 20 million people.

I wrote a long story about the experience many years ago but the amazing outcome of the story was that the man and his wife did get re-united and they both walked out of Kalighat hand in hand – the man having completely recovered from his illness. I can’t explain what happened except to say that I believe I was present when a miracle took place.

I am glad I wrote it all down at the time as I can only now remember elements of what happened. What I do remember clearly was the powerful intimate connection with the man over the course of many hours even though we did not speak the same language (he spoke Hindi).  Through pictures and gestures we connected our disparate lives and joined one another for a short period of time on the journey of life. It was an incredible journey where I found myself crying earnestly and unashamedly at the plight of my fellow pilgrim.

What did I learn from all of this?

Life is precious. In many ways it’s all we have whether we believe in an afterlife or not. Death is very final. There is no going back. For now, our brief period on the planet is precious and our role in the tapestry of life will never be repeated. Its unique to every person alive.

Life is a mystery – even though our scientific understanding has advanced enormously in my lifetime, there is a huge amount that remains inaccessible to us.  We still have no explanation for example, for the emergence of consciousness after a few years of being in the world - that part of us that truly defines us. It remains an elusive mystery.

Life is full of goodness and good people. We are living in very trying times. It is getting harder and harder to actually identify what the essence of life is as we are swamped with the daily needs of how to survive in the societies we have created. Good people and good acts are being drowned out by the noise and demands of consumerism, information overload, economic growth imperatives and the need to manage burgeoning debt in every facet of life.

Those simple moments like being present with somebody as they passed away, slowed everything down, took away all the angst of trying to survive daily life and allowed the simple act of being a loving presence in somebody’s life to materialise.

Life is full of suffering– its unavoidable – but the fact that we do not want people to suffer is fundamental to our humanity. This is a wonderful attribute of being human but it is so easily abused. For me there are too many examples of people using extreme cases of need (appealing to our sense of compassion) to justify laws and interventions that are truly awful. Abortion being the most obvious example. Euthanasia is next.

The connections we make through life are so important particularly as we get closer to death. There are people who love us unconditionally and that unconditional love is honoured by us being alive and present to it.

And finally death is not separate from life. It is a fundamental part of our journey. It’s something we cannot avoid. We are programmed to die.

****

As many of you know, one of my great friends and mentors was John Moriarty (who passed away in June 2007). Although I knew John for over 5 years, the majority of our friendship took place during the last 6 months of his life and I consider it one of the great privileges of my life to have known him particularly in the period just before his death. Conversations with John were never superficial. You could often spend hours in his company, discussing deep and complex ideas and never feel tired or bored. He was an extraordinary story teller and a joy to spend time with.

Two stories come to mind.

John lived in a little Cottage at the base of Mangerton Mountain in Kerry. I would often drive down to his house and spend the day in his company sharing stories with him. We used to have wonderful debates about Science versus Spirituality and I never came away from any discussion with him thinking I had won the argument!

In those last 6 months he was undergoing chemotherapy which was causing his mad shock of wild hair to fall out.

One evening, just as I was leaving, I found him pulling the loose hair from his head and wandering out to his back garden. He explained what he was doing to me:

‘There is a chaffinch in my garden who is building a nest from my discarded hair. The birds are preparing my way to divine ground’

This struck such a deep chord with me. When John did pass away, I arranged to get the nest photographed and it became the cover of a boxset of CD audio recordings of John telling stories in his amazing engaging style.  A simple beautiful technical element to the boxset was that it was designed to look like a block of turf but when you put your warm hands on the box a picture of the nest was revealed. A simple scientific tribute to an extraordinary soul.


I learned many things about death from the great man. One simple insight is that many cultures and societies before ours had a tremendous respect for the journey from life to death (think of the boat journey that the Egyptian Pharaohs had to make) but fundamental to each belief was that the transition from life to death was something truly integrated into our life’s journey and not something separate from it. John used to say that you spend half your life in the ‘getting and gathering’ phase and the other half ‘leaving and letting go’. Death is the ultimate part of this latter phase.

****

The second story is sad and quite traumatic.

As John was getting more and more ill his doctors recommended that he undergo a procedure called tumour embolization. Essentially this means that a surgical procedure is performed so that some blood supply to a tumour is cut-off. This slows the growth down and can buy you some time. The short-term downside of the procedure is intense pain in the area of the operation and so pain relief is essential.

John underwent this procedure but there was a serious mix up with his medication and he was left for five hours, post operation, without the correct pain relief medication. He was in agony for those five hours, so much so, that he had to be moved to a quieter area in the hospital because his moans were disturbing the other patients in the public ward.

A few days after the operation, I was allowed to visit him. I was distraught that the health system had let him down so badly. He was not interested in that. He wanted to discuss pain and suffering in a more general sense. I am paraphrasing his thoughts here but here are the salient ideas:

Suffering is an intrinsic element of life. Humans had to become the cruellest of beings to move to the top of the food chain. The cruelty in the Colosseum was so much worse than the cruelty on the Savannah. You only have to look at the last century to understand how far we can take our cruel capabilities.

Human beings without some sense of ‘soul’ will ultimately consume themselves.  A sense of ‘soul’ will always put you on the side of protecting life and all its possibilities (good and bad).

He believed that the next stage of evolution was to accept the animal nature in us and to work hand in hand with a belief in a transcendent love so that we can move forward and beyond our current primitive urges. To move to a place where we had a sense of ‘soul’ or an appreciation of the divine ground we are all a part of.

At the time, I remember wondering if the embolization procedure that John had had was actually worth it.  All it really does is buy you time and puts off the inevitable for a while.

John anticipated this question and so we discussed the issue of Euthanasia (as I said conversations with John were not superficial!).

It suffices to say that he was not a supporter. He did agree that we should make the transition from life to death as comfortable as possible but he truly wanted to pass from this world alert and conscious and with minimum aid to embrace that great unknown. He called it the Final Eureka moment that we will ultimately all face.

John gave me a book by Nietzsche before he died. He scribbled a note for me on the last page which says:

‘A society without a soul will consume itself’

He was firmly of the view that humankind was in a period of evolutionary regression where more primitive (reptilian) urges were coming to the fore. He believed that unless corrected it would be our undoing.

The last time I saw John was when he joined me on a short walk to my car which I had left a good distance from the house that day because of some flooding in the area.  He was very weak but decided to walk part of the way with me.

‘This is as far along the Journey I can be with you’ he said.

We shook hands. I knew that would be the last time we saw one another. His last words to me were a simple acknowledgement of us all needing one another on the journey. He died a week later (I was overseas at the time and missed his funeral).

****

I would like to mention two other extraordinary people (Stuart Mangan and Simon Fitzmaurice) who have passed away but came into my life and had a profound impact on me.

I met Stuart Mangan at the beginning of 2009. Stuart was 25 when he suffered a catastrophic spinal injury playing a Rugby match in London on April 5th 2008. The injury left him completely paralysed from the neck down. I was asked to help him with some voice control technology so that he could have some control over the communication aspects of his life. Over 6 months we worked together on various projects and by the end of that time he had become an extraordinary super user of voice control (a decade before the current voice control systems like Siri, Google and Alexa that we now take for granted). 

The focus of my work with Stuart was purportedly the technology but actually the two of us became good friends very quickly. Pleasantries were quickly dispensed with and we often had deep conversations about life, death and meaning over many hours when we met.

Stuart was seriously injured. Every day his life hung in the balance. He had decided to be ventilated at home so he could live some semblance of a ‘normal’ life. There are always risks doing this. One of the big challenges is that a simple illness (like a flu or a cut) can easily escalate to something very serious because it is not diagnosed early, on account of him not being able to feel anything.

As a result, he was in and out of hospital on numerous occasions and it was immensely challenging on everyone who cared for him. Every aspect of his daily needs had to be catered for by someone else -  from being lifted out of bed, being washed, dressed, fed, etc. All the while, he was only able to stay alive because a machine was pumping air into his lungs.

I only knew Stuart for about 8 months. We had many conversations about his life but I distinctly remember one where I asked him where did he find the strength to keep going?

‘I stay alive for my family’ he replied.

Those words have stayed with me to this day. Stuart died on August 7th 2009. He was 26 years of age.

Simon Fitzmaurice was my youngest brothers best friend growing up and so he was a regular visitor to our family house in Greystones over the years. He was a wonderful creative fun loving young man.

Simon was diagnosed with motor neuron disease in 2008 and was given a couple of years to live. The health system in Ireland does not ‘encourage’ people to home ventilate so when the disease had progressed to the point that he needed ventilation, he was encouraged to effectively stay in hospital to die.

Simon had other ideas.

Over the next few years, using amazing eye tracking control software, he wrote a wonderful memoir called ‘It’s not Yet Dark’   and directed a full length feature film called ‘My Name is Emily’. A documentary on the making of the film called ‘It’s not Yet Dark’ has featured in multiple film festivals across the world.

Simon was an immense human being. Whether he meant to or not he embodied the idea that life is precious, even when it is tenuous. He literally fought against the prevailing view that he should die in hospital so that he could realise his dreams.

Stuart and Simon are extraordinary examples of the human spirit prevailing in the most difficult of circumstances. They fought for life for the most noble of reasons and left the world a better place because of their endeavours. This does not always have to be the goal. If the only goal is to create as much precious time in the presence of those you love and who in turn love you, surely that is a good starting point for how we decide to support people as they die?

****

About a year ago a dear friend of mine lost his mother. I have known this friend for many years and I consider him one of the most amazing people I have ever met. He has met adversity after adversity with incredible courage and fortitude and he constantly humbles me with his ability to see each challenge through.

I spent a good deal of time with him (and his sister) in the hospital where his mum was dying. I watched in awe as the two of them cared for their mother in the most beautiful, gentle way as she slowly passed away. The love and attention they gave her spoke volumes about their lives together and the respect they had for their mum. It struck me, in a similar way to the way it did in Kalighat, that the intimacy of their companionship was a moment of healing and that even the fact that the time of passing away was uncertain, every moment was precious and important. It seems that we instinctively know how to be with someone we love as they pass away.

We have spoken about it numerous times since his mother passed and it is remarkable how the relatively long days in the hospital before she died are never mentioned. Only the moments on that journey, be it the squeezing of a hand, or a wry smile or a potent memory are what we talk about.

****

Which brings me to my own family. My Dad was 79 recently. Over the last couple of years, he has needed a couple of operations but generally speaking he is doing well physically. He is finding the current restrictions difficult (though he would never admit that!) especially not being able to see his grandchildren regularly.  I really understand now why grandchildren and grandparents are a wonderful combination.  Children bring so much joy and fun into the world. I love seeing my parents laugh and giggle at the antics of their grandchildren. And children thrive when there is an abundance of love around. Grandparents do that at a whim.

My Dad is a brilliant artist, but since his last operation a few years ago, he has not been very active. I don’t know why, but I suspect he got a bit of a shock from the operation and it might have dented his confidence. Anyway, I decided to try and set him a challenge to address the above and asked him to do a portrait of John Moriarty. Here is the chalk version of the work in progress.


I decided to take a photograph of it because the chalk version is a little bit like a Mandala – it could disappear at any moment! He plans to paint a colour version of John now that he has a ‘sense’ of his face.

This picture tells multiple stories. It is firstly an example of the immense talents of my Dad who is 79 (and in my opinion should never have retired). The story behind actually commissioning the portrait, tells of the concerns and fears of the elders in our community because without a focus, isolation can leave them with very little to look forward too. These are people with vast wisdom and experience dearly loved by their families. The elders of our community who in other cultures (especially in Africa) would be treated with the highest respect. It tells of the power of connection that technology enables these days in a time when human connection is limited.  And in a strange kind of way it has been a great reminder to me to remember John and to try to keep his ideas alive.

I have mentioned it already but life is all we have – or at least it’s all we can be certain about. It’s a mystery which can always surprise us. We know that the most exceptional ideas, inventions, concepts, expressions and insights can come from the human mind at any stage and this is something we should treasure and revere.

Over the last couple of years, we have made collective decisions in Ireland that are fundamentally at odds with that perspective. In my opinion, we have regressed (as John Moriarty would say) to a more individualistic and ultimately selfish view of what our societies laws need to reflect at the expense of the most vulnerable and voiceless in our society.

I think Irish society (and Western Society in general) is losing its sense of ‘soul’. We have convinced ourselves that it is ok to legalise the killing of unborn children for example (with some of the most liberal abortion legislation in the world – we know this because many other ‘liberal oriented’ countries cite it as an example of ‘progress’). We are now about to pass legislation (without a referendum) to legalise Euthanasia in this country under the auspices of allowing people ‘Die with Dignity’. This suggests that you cannot actually die with dignity without a bill like this which is patently untrue.  These laws to ‘better or progress’ society pre-suppose that the frail, the vulnerable, the needy, the voiceless have no role to play in society. In fact, a society that cares for its most vulnerable is a far stronger, far healthier, far more resilient society that is able to withstand all kinds of shocks and adversity. The COVID19 crisis and looming climate crisis are exposing this in earnest.

If we were to commit to proper palliative care, well-funded nursing homes and proper home help for people who want to pass away in their homes then we would have a more compassionate, kinder and ultimately more loving society.  The problem of course, is that facilities and resources like this cost money. And although the argument will be given that assisted suicide is not about money, that is exactly what it will be in time. With our current models of society which focus on individual success, economic growth etc. it makes far more economic sense to have people euthanized once they become a significant financial burden. And whether we like it or not, a general acceptance of euthanasia over time will put pressure on people to ‘choose’ this as an option so they are not a burden to those they leave behind. This is the experience of other countries (like Holland) who have legalised euthanasia.

A society that thinks it’s OK to kill our youngest most vulnerable members and our most frail and needy members who have contributed a lifetime to that society is a cruel and heartless creation and is a blight on our humanity.

 

We really can do better than this. 

GMcD October 2020





Thursday, 11 July 2019

Awake

I could not sleep last night. A combination of it being very warm and the fact that my broken (but healing) arm was throbbing made it impossible to stay asleep. So, I headed downstairs to make a cup of tea. I found my 8 year old daughter sitting on her window sill, under the curtain, staring out at the window watching the sunrise. It was 4.45am.

‘Why are you not asleep Alesha?’ I asked.

‘I am watching the sunrise Dad. It’s beautiful’ she answered.

‘It reminds me of the Lion King’

I was really struck that this little 8 year old with the heart and strength of a lioness could appreciate the beauty of a sunrise.

‘Are you struggling to get to sleep?’ I asked.

‘Yes’ she said. ‘I have too many things running through my head. I just cannot relax.’

‘Are they good things’ I probed.

‘Oh yes’ she answered. ‘The problem is there are too many of them!’

The innocence and joy of youth. My children constantly remind me that I once had their sense of innocence and joy and exuberance for life. Time in their presence is energising and wonderful. I would even say its healing.

Getting older though means you inevitably become less exuberant, more cynical and ultimately you lose your innocence. In my opinion it does not necessarily make you a better person. You are less fun to be around; you take less risks. You don’t laugh as much as you used to.

Children pull you back from all of this. A world without children would be a very boring place. It would function and we would have processes and routines to get things done as our days tick by, but it would be less joyful, less fun, be more predictable and ultimately a desperately dull place to exist in. It sometimes feel likes this these days.

In many ways children are the essence of life. They are the life bringers, the energy creators, the enthusiasm cultivators, the future.

Children should be treasured.

6 months ago, my family and I came back to Ireland. We had been in Tasmania for just over three years. We came back to Ireland for family reasons. I consider Ireland to be one of the best places on Earth to raise a family.

Whilst we were away, Ireland, one of the last places in the developed world to have a law that constitutionally protected the life of children in the womb, repealed that law and removed any right to life for unborn children from our constitution. Ireland, like every nation that legalised abortion on demand before it, succumbed to the greatest sophism that human kind has ever created.

That sophism (or clever lie designed to deceive) pretty much says that we have the right to kill our unborn children as they are growing in the womb because it is a reproductive right. To back that argument up another sophism is routinely used. The unborn are not growing children. They are just bunches of parasitic cells feeding off the mother so ‘removing them’ is simply a matter of the right chemicals or the appropriate surgery in much the same way you would remove a tumour.

Finally, to defend the above, the argument is made that only women have a say in deciding whether the unborn child lives or dies. It’s their body and so it’s their choice.

None of the above arguments are based on facts.  They are fallacious arguments that unfortunately have dire consequences to children, the women bearing them, any supporting men involved and society generally.

I don’t write the above to judge anybody. I write it with a heavy heart that makes me realise how far human evolution needs to go before you can honestly say we have left our animal heritage behind. We are so easily led.

In the referendum, two thirds of those that voted, voted to repeal the laws. That amounted to almost 1.5 million people genuinely believing that repealing the rights to life for unborn children was progress for Ireland. After the successful repeal campaign, there were celebrations across the country.  People were dancing on the streets. Ireland had thrown off the shackles of its repressive past and was now a proud and liberated country that was now suddenly, with abortion legalised, a more compassionate country, a place to be proud of, a better place to raise a family.

A number of things stand out for me since legislation to replace the 8th amendment has been passed.

Ireland will have approximately 10,000 abortions a year going forward (the number of people travelling to the UK to terminate their pregnancies before repeal was around 3000).

It will cost the exchequer somewhere between 20 and 50 million euros annually to fund this ‘service’. Around 30% of those taxes will come from people who conscientiously object to abortion. Our health system is already stretched to the brink.

Doctors and medical practitioners who disagree with abortion will be forced to participate in the abortion system regardless of their beliefs and perspective. Remember the Hippocratic oath that all medical practitioners subscribe to: ‘First, Do No Harm….’

3 months into the new legislation a perfectly healthy second trimester baby was killed when it was discovered that the initial ‘fatal foetal abnormality’ proved to be false. A lot of people do not realise that there is significant controversy in the medical community about what a ‘fatal foetal abnormality’ actually is. There is significant evidence to suggest that in many cases the tests are not accurate enough to construct an accurate diagnosis never mind a long-term prognosis.

There is no obligatory healthcare for children that survive an abortion. You may think that this does not happen. It routinely happens in abortion clinics around the world.

Let me stay with the last point because it genuinely disturbs me deeply.

All the major parties in our parliament voted against obligatory healthcare for a child that has survived an abortion.

Picture this (and without going into the graphic details of what happened during the abortion): a child survives the abortion procedure. It is gravely ill and is lying on a hospital operating theatre table. It is completely vulnerable, probably dying, probably in pain.  Our parliament, despite numerous good people pointing out that this exact scenario happens in abortion clinics across the planet, have been unable to put a law into place to guarantee that that child will be afforded care so it can have a dignified life/death?

How on earth did it come to this?

No human being, in their right mind, would deny a sick child proper appropriate care.

It goes to the deepest part of what it means to be human. We care for the most vulnerable. Compassion is our most outstanding and distinguishing feature. It’s what sets us apart as a species.

So again, why are we not able to put a law in place to guarantee healthcare to children who survive abortion?

The primary reason is this.

As soon as you acknowledge that you are now dealing with an actual child who, a few minutes prior to the abortion procedure was in the womb of its mother you have a major problem.

A child is a child is a child.

Suddenly it’s not a ‘parasitic bunch of cells’ that our abortion procedure was removing because it was legal to do so.

Its’s a child. A child in need of care.

The entire house of cards argument that justifies abortion falls apart.  The sophism is exposed.

However, to avoid facing this dilemma, it is easier to bury our heads in the sand and pretend that the argument, the sophism that has convinced so many that abortion is healthcare, still holds true.

That is until we actually face the reality of the above scenario.

With 10000 abortions a year this is likely to happen at some point in the near future.

It may actually take something as awful as this scenario to get us to pull our heads out of the sand and face what abortion actually is:

Abortion involves deliberately killing a human being at its most vulnerable stage in development. No amount of spin can hide this truth.

And this is what we as a country and many before us have legalised.

Since the late sixties and seventies, when abortion was legalised in the UK and the USA, around 1.3 billion (1000 million) abortions have been performed.  That is the population of China and about twice the population of Europe.

About 60 million abortions are performed every year globally – about the same number of people that died in the 2nd World War.

We have aborted more children than the population of planet Earth in the 17/18th century. The romantic period of Mozart, Beethoven and Schubert amongst others. I mention these three because there were all born into poverty and more than likely would be aborted today.

When you are dealing with numbers this large there is a part in all of us that says, given how prevalent abortion is across the planet, surely its OK? Surely with so many women going through the abortion procedure, it must be fine?

Imagine if we are wrong.

Imagine in a distant future we look back at this abortion generation as one of the darkest periods in human history.

Imagine if we have made the greatest and gravest mistake in history.

I unequivocally believe this to be the case.

I am male, middle aged and was born into a Catholic family. I have 4 children. I apparently have no say in the issue of abortion and even if I ignore that perspective nobody will listen to me anyway or so I am told.

Perhaps I am shouting into an echo chamber of my own making.

I still think the truth is worth shouting about.

Abortion is an entirely artificial construct.  It has been around a long time. Its legal origins are believed to have been the legalising of infanticide during the Roman Empire. Ancient Roman texts refer to infanticide as an accepted practice as it was the only way people could control the size of their families in a time before reliable contraception. This happened because there was no safe way to abort an unwanted child and protect the mother when the baby was in the womb.

As horrifying as the killing of newborns seems to us today, in ancient Rome, babies weren’t considered fully human upon birth. Instead, they gained their humanity over time, first with their naming a few days after birth, and later when their teeth emerged, and then when they could eat solid food.

There is a disturbingly similar argument to justify abortion today.

We evolved as mammals because we nurture our young (through the mammary glands hence the name). Unlike reptiles who lay eggs and more often than not, leave their young to fend for themselves, mammals give birth to live young who cannot survive on their own without parental help. We evolved as placenta-based mammals (there are other types of mammals like marsupial mammals) to afford the best possible protection to our unborn children. Longer pregnancies are associated with higher functioning mammals and more evolved brains.

We did not evolve as placenta-based mammals so we could arbitrarily decide to kill our unborn before they were born because it was a reproductive right or because our young were just bunches of cells.

In fact, we evolved this way to give our young the maximum possible protection whilst they were developing in the womb.

That is the stark truth, backed by science, that explains why abortion is wrong and fundamentally at odds with our humanity.

That is why I oppose it.

Who am I though? I am male. I cannot get pregnant. What business is it of mine anyway?

Do I really have to convince people that men have a key nurturing role in supporting children and their mums? Do I really have to tell you that abortion suits men? That it allows us to take no responsibility for pregnancy?  Do I really have to tell you that good men will protect and even die for those they love especially their children? Do I really need to tell you that children help men grow up, become better people?

To dismiss men who oppose abortion in this debate is folly at its most ludicrous.

To the men that support abortion - dig deeper and face the truth. You will be better men for it.

Women bear the brunt of the consequences of pregnancy. Nobody denies that.
Women also bear the brunt of the consequences of abortion. Pretty much everyone on the pro-abortion side denies this.

It’s a lie. Abortion has a profound impact on us all particularly women. Having your unborn child killed is anathema to our core humanity. The consequences of this are not always something we are consciously aware of.

A note on my middle age baggage badge.

Here are some honest thoughts on many of my female friends and connections I have made over my middle-aged life experience:

I know women that have had an abortion. I really do feel for them. The evidence I see is that it has a profoundly negative effect on them.

I know women who have children who are very ill. My heart and support goes out to them and I truly wish society made it easier to support mother and child throughout their lives.

I know women who would not have an abortion themselves but are pro-choice. I really question this perspective.

I know women who never want children. I respect that choice.

I know women who want children but cannot have them. I feel for them deeply.

I know young women who want children but are still very young. I encourage them to be careful and bide their time. It’s a big responsibility to bring a child into the world.

I know women who have adopted children. I salute them.

I know women who have had children in awful circumstances where there was no consent. These women humble me to tears.

And from this range of connections to the stronger, more beautiful, more awe inspiring sex I want to leave you with two truisms that I can honestly stand over:

Lots of women that I know who have had an abortion now regret it and wish they could reverse the decision.

No woman has ever said to me that they regret having their child regardless of the circumstances of their birth. None.


And a final word on children....

Children want to be supported, encouraged, accepted and loved. They are the future. Its is our responsibility to support and enable that future. If we build a society on these principles, bringing children into the world becomes an easier choice and abortion disappears as an option. This society is something we should all be striving for. Abortion plays nothing but a desperately negative role in this ambition.

And finally we were all children once. Many of us came into the world in the unplanned, less controlled, unexpected part of the probability curve. I for one am glad of that. I can also speak for my own children especially my 8 year old lioness.

GMcD 10/07/2019